By Anonymous on Saturday, July 3, 2004 - 03:37 am:
LC-MS applications are growing rapidly. A board for LC-MS would be welcome as well. Maybe a subsection under LC?
By Siva on Monday, July 5, 2004 - 04:05 am:
Dear All,
A board on LC-MS will be definitely useful.
Kindly make a separate section for LCMS.
By Murugan on Monday, July 5, 2004 - 04:42 am:
Dear All,
A separate LC-MS board will be very much useful to the peoples who are working in LCMS. Kindly think about the possibility of forming a separate board for LCMS
By Anonymous on Monday, July 5, 2004 - 10:41 pm:
Dear Tom,
It is consistently observed that a few discussions continue years together, though not with the query started with .
Classical examples are
1.HPLC conditions for basic compound?
originated on Thursday, December 19, 2002 - 09:37 am:
2.Method development
originated on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 10:23 pm:
They are being continued till today.Getting in to that for a specific problem makes one to read(or atleast a bird’s eye view)the entire text from the origin.so certain topics of continuous interest and discussion can be segregated,to avoid ‘anaconda’s tail’.
LC-MS is one such topic.
Looking forward to your view on this.
Michael.K Raj
By tom jupille on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - 10:16 am:
To all: *please* look at the two "test" fora:
http://www.sepsci.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi
http://www.sepsci.com/phpBB2/index.php
Now is your chance to provide input and suggestions.
By tom jupille on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - 10:22 am:
To Michael:
"Hijacked" threads are a general problem to which there are no single/simple solutions.
All three of the "back end" programs that we are looking at allow threads to be "locked" after a certain amount of inactivity. That should help avoid the problem of additions to old threads.
To minimize the problem with currently active threads, increasing the number of boards should help (e.g., if you look at the test fora referenced above, you'll see that we've got separate boards for LC-MS and GC-MS). The rest will depend on more agressive moderation; we'll simply have to move messages into new topics if they represent a change of direction.
By Michael.K Raj on Thursday, July 8, 2004 - 01:55 am:
Dear Tom,
It's a good work.
Test forum 1 :
This is almost in the same lay-out as the present one with more discussion boards.As people are used to this continuation in this is no difficult[ie. more (regular)user friendly]
Test forum 2:
This is modern ,different and attractive.
Let's hear more
-Michael.K Raj
By siva on Friday, July 9, 2004 - 01:27 am:
Dear Tom Jubille,
It is really a useful for those peoples working on LCMS.
Test Forum 1:
This is simple and user friendly, I will prefer this than 2nd one.
Test forum 2:
OK .
Nice work.
By Murugan on Friday, July 9, 2004 - 01:34 am:
Dear Jupillie,
Nice to know about the formation of LCMS and GCMS forum...
It will be definitely useful for peoples like us working in LCMS.
Test forum 1 is Userfriendly than Test forum 2.
Good work.
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.