Reproducibility

Chromatography Forum: GC Archives: Reproducibility
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 - 12:48 am:

Hi. I am new with GC. My question is: How can I know that my GC performing well? What is the acceptable reproducibility percentage of 1st and 2nd injection of a sample?

Thanks.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 - 04:40 am:

Good question anon,

what are You using: manual or sampler injections?
Solvent, injector, sample...

With other words: You can get a range of 1%...


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 12:46 am:

manual injections with standard sample. I calibrated my sample eg. dodecane and internal standard - tetradecane.

my RSD 4.6% Is that bad?

Thanks.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 05:53 am:

It is not the best. Bad? is depends upon what RSD you NEED. But with good technique and with a good syringe, 1% RSD should be attainable without undue effort. 2% RSD using a splitter.

Most analysts do not know how to inject reproducibly with manual injection.

We dinosaurs died off when the big meteor called autosamplers hit the planet.

Good luck.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By mbg on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 07:11 am:

My RSD was ~5% (no internal std) if I remember correctly when I was new to GC. Though my injection technique wasn't the greatest.

Also keep in mind, the error (especially with a internal standard) is also a reflection of the GC conditions/program and not just injection speed/vol. delivery. This becomes especially sensitive when compounds are eluting at longer retention times.

Diesel fuels primarily have a pyramid like pattern of n-alkanes. Successive injections with my autosampler could show a differnent alkane as the apex of the pyramid.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Thursday, April 22, 2004 - 09:47 am:

In quantitative GCMS analysis, which parameter is most reliable and most reproducible? Is it the peak area or the peak height? why?


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password: