Hi. I am new with GC. My question is: How can I know that my GC performing well? What is the acceptable reproducibility percentage of 1st and 2nd injection of a sample?
Thanks.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Monday, December 15, 2003 - 04:40 am:
Good question anon,
what are You using: manual or sampler injections?
Solvent, injector, sample...
With other words: You can get a range of 1%...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 12:46 am:
manual injections with standard sample. I calibrated my sample eg. dodecane and internal standard - tetradecane.
my RSD 4.6% Is that bad?
Thanks.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 05:53 am:
It is not the best. Bad? is depends upon what RSD you NEED. But with good technique and with a good syringe, 1% RSD should be attainable without undue effort. 2% RSD using a splitter.
Most analysts do not know how to inject reproducibly with manual injection.
We dinosaurs died off when the big meteor called autosamplers hit the planet.
Good luck.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By mbg on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 - 07:11 am:
My RSD was ~5% (no internal std) if I remember correctly when I was new to GC. Though my injection technique wasn't the greatest.
Also keep in mind, the error (especially with a internal standard) is also a reflection of the GC conditions/program and not just injection speed/vol. delivery. This becomes especially sensitive when compounds are eluting at longer retention times.
Diesel fuels primarily have a pyramid like pattern of n-alkanes. Successive injections with my autosampler could show a differnent alkane as the apex of the pyramid.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Thursday, April 22, 2004 - 09:47 am:
In quantitative GCMS analysis, which parameter is most reliable and most reproducible? Is it the peak area or the peak height? why?