Isotope abundance and LC-MS

Chromatography Forum: LC-MS & GC-MS Archives: Isotope abundance and LC-MS
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Roy Kump on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 07:41 am:

In my full MS spectra, I'm having 2 to 5 more masses, around the mass of interest. For example for m/z 1448, I also see 1446; 1447, 1449; 1450. Is this related to the isotope abundance or to the quality of my experiments? And about, the isotope abundance, I read this in an abstract:"The isotope abundance of the [M+H]+ ... was also analyzed". Which practical information can I get from this analysis, while studying the fragmentation pattern of a compound or while investigating unknown compound? (I don't have experience with LC-MS).


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 11:19 am:

Roy,
One of the simplest things to get from isotope abundances is an estimate of the number of carbons in the mass you are looking at. C-13 is about 1.1% of C-12 so for a fragment with ten carbons the M+1+H mass should be roughly abouot 11% the heigt of the M+H mass. Check any good mass spec book for good coverage of the subject.

Regards,
Mark


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By MG on Friday, January 23, 2004 - 11:57 am:

Here's a good site that will calculate a theoretical abundance for you, given a molecular formula, although it doesn't seem to work for larger molecules at the moment.

http://www2.sisweb.com/mstools/isotope.htm

At > ~ 91 carbons, your C-13 peak will exceed your C-12 (monoisotopic) peak. For a simple hydrocarbon, this corresponds to ~ 1280 m/z. Other elements such as Cl, Br, S, will also have their own contributions. The book "Interpretation of Mass Spectra" by McLafferty is a good one. It was written for EI fragmentation, not LC/MS, but all the isotope info still applies.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Roy Kump on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 12:06 am:

I thank u all for ur comments. I don't understand the following statement as given by MG: "At > ~ 91 carbons, your C-13 peak will exceed your C-12 (monoisotopic) peak". On the other hand I'm still concerned about the large number of masses around my mass of interest, making the spectrum even look a bit strange.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By MG on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 08:17 am:

Roy, to clarify that statement: Suppose you have a compound that works by LC/MS, and you expect to see the ion at 1280 m/z. If the compound contains mostly C and H, and does not contain Cl, Br, or anything weird, you will also see a peak at 1281 m/z at approximately equal abundance. In mass spec lingo, this is sometimes called an "A+1" peak. If you add carbons from there, your "A+1" peak will exceed your "A" peak in abundance. This is due to the natural abundance of carbon-13. As you increase the number of carbons in a molecule, the number of molecules containing at least one C-13 in a given sample increases. At high masses, you'll also start to see some "A+2" contribution from molecules containing 2 carbon-13's.

Going back to what Mark posted on Jan.23, in a sample of compound containing 10 carbons, about 11% of the molecules will contain one C-13, so you'll see an "A+1" peak at 11% of the abundance of your "A" peak.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  By Roy Kump on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 11:19 am:

Thank u all for ur comments


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password: