I am seeking information regarding any problems or bias that may be encountered with the accuracy of recovery of spiked low level (0.1% - 0.5%)impurities into a drug substance with a method that uses a flow rate gradient (1.0 mL/minute - 2.0 mL/minute in 16 minutes)when compared to the same method with a constant flow rate. The method is a reverse phase system with UV detection. Quantitation of chromatographic impurities is performed using a low level external standard of the main active compound. Is there any theoretical explanation that would relate to accuracy differences when using a flow rate gradient? (not mobile phase gradient)
All responses are appreciated.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Uwe Neue on Monday, January 13, 2003 - 03:39 pm:
Yes, there is a problem with quantitation in a flow gradient with UV detection. The UV detector gives you a signal that is proportional to concentration. If you integrate this signal (= peak area), you get concentration x time. At constant flow rate, you multiply this signal with the flow rate (= volume/time), and you get concentration x volume = mass. In other words, peak integration is proportional to the mass injected. At constant flow, the integrated signal is always the same, independent of the retention of the peak. Not so in a flow gradient! If the retention time of your peak shifts, it will elute at different flow rates, and the integration will give you a result that depends on the retention time. This will affect the reproducibility of your determination.
For a rather slow increase in flow as described by you, you may get away with it, and the problem may be small. As long as you know what is going on...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 07:06 am:
Thanks for the quick response. Can you give me a data reference for this information?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Uwe Neue on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 04:32 pm:
Nothing in my book. The closest that I could find is a table on page 653 in Snyder/Kirkland "Practical HPLC Method Development".
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Uwe Neue on Tuesday, January 14, 2003 - 04:38 pm:
Here is another one: there is a section in Veronika Meyer's "Tips and Tricks in Pictures", or whatever the book is called in English. I only have the German version. Check at amazon.com for the real name. Chapter 2.20, "Influence of the Flow Rate on the Peak Area".