Hello, chromatographers!
My lab is interested in working with bacterial
cultures using HPLC. Has anyone
out there had success working with bacteria
without using sample filtration? We'd prefer
to use a benchtop centrifuge. A centrifuge
can take out the vast majority of bacteria
from a sample, but bacteria are really small
(smaller than a precolumn filter pore),
so it seems risky. Does anyone have any
information about this?
thanks!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Monday, December 29, 2003 - 12:17 pm:
The column will clog after some time, depending how good the centrifugation is. The column costs $400. Without filtering, you may get 200 injections out of it. That's $2.- per sample. Do you care?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous2 on Tuesday, December 30, 2003 - 02:24 pm:
Why not use a guard column, and discard that when pressure rises?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By RH on Monday, January 5, 2004 - 06:43 am:
I agree with the previous posting as work with microorganisms will lead to clogged columns soon but a 15 min full-speed centrifugation should remove most of intact bacteria. Another problem might remain with proteins from lysed bacteria that are normally present in culture supernatants. So a precipitation step using Sulfosalicylic acid or Acetonitrile can improve the situation. Most favorable would be a solid phase extraction step that removes whole organisms by size exclusion and macromolecular contaminations by adsorption/ exclusion mechanisms.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By HW Mueller on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 01:18 am:
Centrifugation + microfiltration could do the trick. If there is a protein problem you can get rid of most of them with an ultrafiltration (there are systems with which that can be done in one step with the microfiltration).
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 08:53 am: