I need to know the difference between the two. We both use them in our HPLC. Can anyone tell me the difference in application and its parameters. Thank you.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Anonymous on Thursday, April 22, 2004 - 05:22 pm:
Although I dont really understand the true nature of your question, I'll do my best. The DAD is an Agilent product while the PDA (996/2996) are Waters products. Other companies may also use the DAD/PDA acronyms as well, I dont think they are trademarked. Both do the same job in a similar manner although there are differences in the design and software. The 2 biggest differences that would affect a user is the use of a reference wavelength (used to account for RI effects) and the variable slit width on the DAD. The PDA does not need a reference wavelength due to its cell design and has a fixed slit width. The slit width on the DAD is used to account for lowering lamp energy with time. The PDA uses a lamp normalization routine instead.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Alex on Friday, April 23, 2004 - 06:20 am:
Hi chemville.
What are the differences from the practical point of view. Do you see any differences in the results?
up to now I thougt DAD and PDA to be synonyms of (Photo)Diode Arraray (Detector)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By DR on Friday, April 23, 2004 - 08:18 am:
They are synonyms - there is the same type of vendor to vendor variation among Diode Array detectors as you find among UV/VIS detectors, compounded by software issues. Waters/Agilent are discussed above. Thermo uses a 5cm flow cell and their own software to get a very high S/N ratios. Hardware from Shimadzu, PE and Dionex is a little different from the above too. You really have to evaluate diode array systems as a package.